“Complex” has both a colloquial meaning and a scientific one. Scientifically, it describes a system whose many interdependent parts interact nonlinearly, allowing behaviors to emerge that cannot be easily predicted from individual components.
Biological systems like the immune system, the human brain, and ecosystems are complex, as are technological systems like large language models (LLMs) and our electrical grid. Even social systems like cities, economies, governments, and social networks share the scientific properties of complex systems.
That’s how a single bankruptcy can trigger a widespread financial crisis, while the actions of a single protester can topple a regime. It’s the complexity of technological and social systems that our institute investigates.
But “complex” can also refer more colloquially to the kinds of thorny problems, from reforming our healthcare system to addressing climate change to managing a large-scale project at work, that have no obvious solution and involve difficult (and often unpredictable) tradeoffs.
By looking at these thorny problems through the scientific lens of complexity, we can better make sense of them, and more clearly see a path forward.
Complexity and progress often go hand in hand. As economies mature, supply chains grow longer and more opaque. As financial systems mature, risks become more intertwined. As technology matures, it becomes less intuitive. As science matures, it becomes more specialized. As societies mature, their institutions and policies grow more complicated and interconnected.
In many ways, this is a good thing! We want to live in a world where people continue to innovate on the status quo. Simpler systems often leave a lot on the table; complexity is what has brought—and will continue to bring—increased productivity and prosperity.
But we know from decades of research on complex systems that complexity brings challenges as well. Complex systems are more fragile, with hidden dependencies creating cascading effects and increasing the likelihood of “black swan” events. Complex systems also have an inherent degree of unpredictability that can be difficult for decision-makers to even comprehend, not to mention account for.
In complex systems, trust in others’ expertise becomes more essential at the very same time that it becomes harder to maintain. And with trust so low, cooperation on a wide range of collective problems, from climate change to data privacy, becomes harder.
Faculty Directors
The Ryan Institute is led by three Kellogg professors who are all highly recognized leaders in their fields, as well as frequent collaborators.
Dashun Wang
Kellogg Chair of Technology
Professor of Management and Organizations
Co-Director Ryan Institute on Complexity
Director, Northwestern Innovation Institute
Director, Center for Science of Science and Innovation
Benjamin Jones
Gordon and Llura Gund Family Professorship in Entrepreneurship
Professor of Strategy
Co-Director, Ryan Institute on Complexity
Brian Uzzi
Richard L. Thomas Professor of Leadership and Organizational Change
Professor of Management and Organizations
Co-Director, Ryan Institute on Complexity
Co-Director, Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems
How are we funded?
The Ryan Institute on Complexity was created through a $25 million gift from the Ryan Family Foundation.
PAT RYAN JR. ’97 JD, MBA,“We are thrilled to support the establishment of this revolutionary research institute. Cutting-edge analytical approaches can now unlock unimaginable understandings of our complex world that will be transformational for business and society.”
a Northwestern University trustee